Attention, fraud: false bank employees cure thousands of euros!

Attention, fraud: false bank employees cure thousands of euros!

In the Werra-Meißner district, a perfidious fraud stitch causes excitement. A 48-year-old was a victim of criminal machinations that hide behind the stitch "false bank employees". According to Image , the man received a deceptively real-looking email from the supposed "Sparkasse Werra-Meißner". In it he was asked to open a link to alleged software update for his online banking. This first step was the start of a series of events that ended in a severe financial loss.

The 48-year-old received a call from an alleged IT employee from the Sparkasse on the same day, who introduced himself as "Jonas Hoffmann". The caller complained about strange bookings in the man's account, which must be canceled. In the belief that everything was correct, the injured party installed a remote control program on his PC and transmitted several transaction numbers (TAN). The fraudsters thus had free access to his accounts and carried out several debit. Only when his wife's account details were asked about his wife's account details, the man suspected. He then contacted his bank, which confirmed the fraud and immediately blocked his accounts. The perpetrators had already received an amount in the low five -digit range.

tips for fraud prevention

In the recent past, there have been numerous cases in which fraudsters used similar methods. For example, a case was reported by a victim to the request of an alleged bank employee. Such incidents show how important it is to actively inform yourself about current fraud stitches and to acquire appropriate behavior in order to protect yourself. The Test.de Article offers valuable tips on how to slow fraudsters.

Incidentally, judgments show that in many cases in the event of a fraud, the account holder does not always have a gross negligence. For example, the Darmstadt District Court decided that a customer who activated a digital card on the smartphone of a fraudster did not commit a gross negligence because no direct bank details or secret numbers were passed on. This could encourage some of those affected to assert their rights in such cases.

In summary, it should be noted that distrust is the best protection. If something seems suspicious, you should rather consider going to the bank or your own call for clarification. So worse can be prevented.

Details
OrtEschwege, Deutschland
Quellen

Kommentare (0)